This is a video of a debate I chaired at the Battle of Ideas some time ago.
I have thought about the issues that were raised by the speakers since and I have concluded that children ought to be taught philosophy and that this should be a mandatory part of the Secondary English National Curriculum.
There is a lot of mysticism that surrounds this subject. One mystical pedagogic belief about this subject is that it can only be taught to some. Often former students of philosophy and amateur philosophers promote this view. In doing so they express an elitist and pessimistic view of knowledge.
In my experience actual teachers of philosophy and professional philosophers are the best people to speak to on this matter. Those that I speak to adopt a more pragmatic, aspirational, can-do, perspective and show the rest of us how the teaching of philosophy might be done.
I see philosophy as a tough humanities subject, like history, which contains a body of powerful knowledge. English pupils are entitled to be provided with access to this powerful knowledge and it is the duty of teachers and schools to provide them with this access.
All English students, in my view, should study philosophy as a part of their compulsory education.
I hope you enjoy the debate.
I certainly enjoyed chairing it.
Can children do philosophy?
Philosophy is a venerable university subject, but until recently it was much less common in schools. If anything, philosophy was taught to over-16s only, and in a historical context. Aristotle’s principle of contradictions would have been learnt first, before any attempts were made to apply it, and that was about it. Today, though, there is a whole ‘Philosophy For Children’ (P4C) movement. Its aim is to help children even at primary school to think for themselves using a wide variety of materials to instigate questioning and inquiry, like provocative stories designed to stimulate young people’s thinking about friendship, fairness, truth and other key moral concepts.
Critics of teaching philosophy in primary schools maintain that philosophy is not just a formal way of inquiry involving dilemmas, reasons, criteria and fallacies. It also has its own tradition, a long quest for truth about the human condition and more, which would-be philosophers must engage with. Supporters of P4C insist children do not need this body of knowledge to philosophise because philosophy teaches reasoning in a conceptual way. What’s more, they maintain that an early introduction to philosophical dialogue would foster a deeper empathy for the experiences of others, as well as a crucial understanding of how to use reason to resolve disagreements. They say it promotes the development of reasoned argument and higher-order thinking – skills which underlie learning in most other domains (including literacy and numeracy) and which are essential for responsible civic engagement.
Yet, shouldn’t a lot of the issues that children raise in P4C about god, the nature of the world and feelings be taught in other subject such as religious studies, science or literature instead? We are told that philosophical enquiry in primary schools offers children the confidence to exercise independent judgement. But could the use of bespoke P4C materials undermine the development of genuine autonomy and creativity in learners? Are we doing a disservice to children by letting them think that arguing without any prior study is meaningful? Is teaching philosophy to kids a good opportunity to discuss important subjects with young minds or just a case of dumbing down complicated ideas?
Speakers:
Dr Catherine McCall (director, the European Philosophical Inquiry Centre);
Alka Sehgal Cuthbert (educator, writer);
Adam Seldon (co-director, Lauriston Lights, an education charity);
Peter Worley (CEO and co-founder, The Philosophy Foundation).
Thanks to the team at WORLDwrite for their production work on this video.